Hello Experts,
I've read the Best Practices for PP and QM master data, as well as the BPs for Creating and Completing inspection lots.
I have 03 activated for my inspection type usage.
When the PO is released, I am not seeing an auto inspection lot.
Please suggest the troubleshooting steps to solve this issue. Some are auto creating and some are not, but my QM MData is correct for inspections...
Thanks
Verroz
Hi all ;
We want to list our inspection plans with a alv report. We use tables MAPL - PLKO - PLMK - PLPO - PLMW .
But , we can not find dependent characteristics in tables , when i click f1 , i get belowed result. It is a structure.
How can i get plmwb-lifnr with their characteristic results ?
Regards.
M.Ozgur Unal
Dear All,
I have requirement to block the payment if inspection lot (01 Inspection type) is not cleared by quality. Activated QM Proc active and maintained control key 0007 in material master QM view.
I rejected the lot, able to generate the Invoice for the purchase order/line item in MIRO with message as 'Blocked for Payment", but manually able to make the payment. I could not understand what config or steps are missing to Block the Payment incase of lot is rejected in QM. Requesting to throw some light to fix the issue which will be highly appreciable.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri
Hi experts,
As a new comer in sap qm, ask for help.
In IDES enviroment, I could not find any inpsection examples for inspection origin 07, 09, 12, 13,17.
could any experts has used these inspection origin, pelease give a hand.
| Number | Inspection lot origin |
|---|---|
| 07 | Audit |
| 09 | Recurring inspection |
| 13 | Repetitive manufacturing |
| 17 | Externally triggered inspection |
Dear Quality Experts,
I have an incident in which we need to Scrap the Quality inspection-Quarantine stock.
The details of the issue are
1. QI stock received from a process order which is closed and settled 2 years back.
2. The material was having inspection type with Auto UD without IP
3. Physically the stock is not existing on the Quality inspection floor.
4. Material is having batch without Inspection lot.
5. Batch SLED date is in the past (2013)
6. Tried MB1A with movement type 553 without success.
Kindly suggest a solution.
Regards,
Shiva
Hi,
When someone modify the coding in the notification, a new notification with the same task is created (QM02).
How to stop this duplicate notification?
Regards,
Shiva
hi sap experts.
we want to reset usage decision.
i search and found the sap note 33924, and this note :
activat an existing SAP user exit (SAP function EXIT_SAPMQEVA_008, Include ZXQEVU10, Include LXQEVF10). Activating this function causes a new button (Reset Usage Decision) to appear on the toolbar of the QA12 transaction
i copy this code to ZXQEVU10 and active it. but i dont have button (Reset Usage Decision) again.
thanks for your helps.
***INCLUDE LXQEVF10.
*-- Example: Reset the Usage decision
*-- Please add your own authority requirements here or
*-- use the authority check within the general status management
*-- by adding a user status profile
*-- Reset Status Usage Decision by using business transaction QM68.
CALL FUNCTION 'QAST_PROCESS_ACTIVITY'
EXPORTING
* I_DIALOG = 'X'
I_OBJNR = I_QALS-OBJNR
I_VORGANG = 'QM68'
EXCEPTIONS
NOT_ALLOWED = 1
ACTIVITY_NOT_ALLOWED = 2
OTHERS = 3.
E_EXIT_ACTIVE = 'X'.
Hi Experts,
I just wanted to introduce my self... I am new SAP QM.. now I m in a Roll out project.. I have lots of clarifications regarding the Configuration as well..
1) I have a done settings at plant level. all the data is copied and the Name1 and Name2 remains the same, from the copied plant.. when I check the new plant in QS21 the plant is accepting and the name of the plant is existing name from the plant which is copied.
2) I have a Codegroups for Catalogs which is provided by the user, and the same has to be configured in SAP, my question is, is it possible to configure within the existing code groups are or need to be created separately for new plant.
waiting for your reply
Regards,
James.
Dear all,
I have some old quality notifications, which can not be displayed with QM03. But they are in the tabel QMEL. And they are not archived.
These are usual quality notifications. Any help would be highly appreciated.
Thanks a lot.
Hi All,
While I am creating GR against process order with mvt. type 531(Receipt By Product) there are two inspection lots creating automatically with same batch , material document , process order with same quantity for the selected material and plant. While I see in MB51 there it shows only one movement has taken please with mvt 531 for selected material , plant and batch.
How the duplicate inspection lot is creating automatically for by-product? Please do let me know if you need more information about the process.
Thanks in advance!
With Regard,
NKB
Hi Experts,
My self James here.. I need a clarification on the movement types which are used in QM module. how the movement types plays a key role in QM.
Dear Experts,
Is there any way to restrict inspection lot creation for a particular vendor even if 01-Inspection type is active. Let me know if it is possible after excluding solutions such as the functionality of QM info record (skip based on vendor certification system, source inspection lot).
Thanks & regards,
Keerthi P
Dear QM Experts,
We are facing an issue in sample size calculation when the Inspection Lot Quantity is less than 1 Kg Lets Say for Ex: 0.5 Kg. We are using MICs inside the Plan with suitable Sampling Procedure. The Sampling Procedure has the Following Settings
Sampling Type = Fixed Sample, Valuation Mode = Attributive inspection for Non-Confirming Units, No of Samples = 2
So Whenever the Inspection Lot Quantity is 1 Kg or More than that then Each of the MICs inside the results recording screen has the "Inspect" Column correctly set to 2. However when the inspection Lot Quantity is set to 0.5 Kg, the "Inspect" Column for that MIC is set to "1".
Kindly Provide your suggestions how to handle this ?. Kindly advise if we can avoid this by changes to Inspection Plan or Sampling Procedure.We would like to have the "Sample Size" or the "No of Inspections" to be carried out on a MIC to be Fixed irrespective of the Inspection Lot Quantity.
Regards
Ram
Dear All,
For ERSA material 01 inspection type is active with indicator Post to inspection stock only as it can be purchased. No other indicator is set.
This material can be sent for repairing outside with DAMAGE valuation type (stock provided to Vendor with DAMAGE valuation type).
For SubCon scenario, Purchase Order with Account Assignment Category F and Item Category L has been created.
Once GR using MB01 with 101 movement, consumption posting takes place and as Insp type 01 is active Inspection lot is getting created with status REL CALC.
At this time, DAMAGE stock against Vendor is getting reduced with Qty of 543 movement.
Now when, reversal 102 with MB01 is done against Purchase Order and details are adopted with reference to 101 material document, reversal is taking place, but at the same time respective material doc's Inspection lot status is not getting changed to LTCA. It remains REL only.
For 122 return to Vendor using MBRL also, Insp lot status is not getting changed.
Has anybody faced such issue? Is this standard SAP?
Kindly throw light on the process, is correct process followed?
Regards,
Tanuj Parikh
We had an Inspection Lot (Type 01) that was waiting for the cert to be received via (QC55). Normally, this would stay on the worklist in (QE51N) until the UD was made. This was not the case. It fell off list until manufacturing needed the parts. Can anyone tell me why this lot would have disappeared from the list without the receipt of the certificate and UD?
Thanks
Dear All,
I have requirement to block the payment if inspection lot (01 Inspection type) is not cleared by quality. Activated QM Proc active and maintained control key 0007 in material master QM view.
I rejected the lot, able to generate the Invoice for the purchase order/line item in MIRO with message as 'Blocked for Payment", but manually able to make the payment. I could not understand what config or steps are missing to Block the Payment incase of lot is rejected in QM. Requesting to throw some light to fix the issue which will be highly appreciable.
Thanks & Regards,
Ramagiri
Dear Gurus,
I was wondering if it was possible to revert a material which is in the skipped stage back to initial stage of the DMR on a particular date.
I have been through various threads and have realized that we can get it back to the initial stage say after X no. of skips or Y no. of days but I am looking for an option where I can cause a part no. to revert back to initial stage on say, 1st of August.
Please do let me know if this is possible in the standard process.
Thank you.
Sanila
Hi,
how do you keep track of why there is a specific inspection characteristic in an inspection plan?
Examples: because of customer specification XY, section 123
And how do you keep track of who is the reason?
Examples: customer, internal party, ...
Kind regards
Marcus.
Dear Experts,
This issue is related to inspection lot stock posting through usage decision.
The user has done posting in QA11-Usage Decision for 105 Qty to Scrap twice (Document no. 4909089699 and 4909089703 as shown in screenshot).
The document 4909089703 has posted successfully but the document 4909089699 is not available in MB51 and any related tables (MSEG, QAMB etc.) and the stock 105 qty is still in QI stock.
1) Now the user wants to post the 105 Qty in QI stock to Unrestricted. How can this be done?
2) How is this possible that the document details is shown in Usage decision ->stock posting log but dint get updated anywhere else?
I know that it is possible to attacht documents to inspection lots, inspection methods and codes of qualitative insp. char.
But is it possible to attach documents (PDFs, images, etc.) directly to MICs to make clear what is meant by the inspection characteristic?
Regards
Marcus.