Hi
In our SAP system, batch status management is active and we have activated e-signature for result recording and UD.
Now when we are rejecting a lot through UD, system is asking us to put the batch in restricted status giving an error message. Is there a way we can modify this validation through config settings?
Regards,
Sri
Dears,
we just configued underdelivery and over to check the confirmed quantity and to display error when quantity falls below underdelivery tolerance and to display error when overdelivery tolerance is exceeded.
In COR6 its works when the tab is Quantity/Activity , but when i move to Dates tab the system not checking on quantities. Please advise.
Dear All,
One of my client's requirement is that they want to enter both vendor serial number and in-house serial number at the time of doing quality inspection for the material. I have checked in the SCN forum and found that Serial No. profile has to be activated in Material Master and then enter serial no at the time doing of MIGO. The assigned serial number is reflecting in quality inspection while making UD. But while doing MIGO we can enter either Vendor Sl. No. or In-house Sl. No. Can anyone tell me the possible solution for solving this issue. Expecting solution at the earliest
Regards
V. Srinivasa Ranganath
Hi,
I assigned values to the fields Target Value, Lower Specific Limit, Upper Limit, Lower Plausibility Limit & Upper Plausibility Limit in MIC. In the Results recording screen ( QE51N) I am able to see only Target value, Lower and Upper Limit. I am not able to see the fields - Lower and Upper Plausibility limits. I want to know whether I need to change any Control indicators or do any configuration changes to ensure the fields and their values are displayed in the results recording screen.Thanks.
Hi Experts,
I think this is a simple one.....
I used the Dynamic Selection for Delivery one time. I entered the delivery number.
Now every time I go into QA32 it opens with the Dynamic Selection icon showing "1 active"..... the one that was entered some time ago.
If I don't remember to simply remove the delivery number, QA32 shows no results because it's looking for that one delivery....
How do I simply deselect the Dynamic selection icon as opposed to turning it completely off???
Thanks in advance.
VERROZ
I'm thinking about putting in an OSS note on this but I'd like to see if any other people see this same behavior.
In QA32, I can go to the dynamic selections and add "Vendor Batch" as a selection item.
In the selection screen I enter in a material number that I know has inspection lots out there and that I know has the "Vendor Batch" field populated in the batch master.
I then execute the selection and QA32 returns no inspection lots.
If I remove the vendor batch number from the selection criteria and rerun just using material number, I get many batches of the material.
If I put in the vendor batch number and execute again, no inspection lots are found.
I would think this is a bug. Can someone else verify what I'm seeing? I couldn't find any OSS notes on this nor could I find any discussion on this. If it can be verified some where else, I'll put up an OSSS note on it.
This is a 6.0 system. NO EHP 4.
Craig
Hello QM experts,
I am trying to run the Auto UD program RQEVAI30 (Varient created in T-code QA10 for one XXXX Plant) in Background. Program is scheduled in Background to run after every 15 Mins. System is getting the inspection lot nos in this batch job after Insp. Lot getting created.
But after getting Inspection lot nos in the batch job, system is giving the error as mentioned below.
"No batch input data for screen SAPLSPO1 0500"
Same program when I tried to run in foreground (Using QA16 Transaction by selection option "UD in Background) system is giving the same error. Details of the error is as below.
"
Message no. 00344
The transaction sent a screen that was not expected in the batch input session and which therefore could not be supplied with data.
Possible reasons:
1. The batch input session was created incorrectly. The sequence of screens was recordly incorrectly.
2. The transaction behaves differently in background processing in a batch work process than when running in dialog (SY-BATCH is queried and changes the screen sequence).
3. The transaction has undergone user-specific Customizing and therefore certain screens may be skipped or processed differently, according to the current user. If the person who created a batch input session is not the same as the person now processing it, this problem may occur frequently.
None.
For 1: Either re-create the session or process it in expert mode. Correct the batch input program.
For 2. It is very difficult to analyze this problem, particularly in the case that the screen sequence or the display-only options of fields differ according to whether the transaction is being processed in the background or as an online dialog. It could also be that this kind of transaction cannot run with batch input.
For 3: Have the creator of the session process it. If no error occurs now, then this is a program with user-specific Customizing."
There is no issue in varient & data maintained in Varient becuse on DEV & QA server progrm is running successfully whereas in PRD server it is givng above mentioned error.(All data maintained in Varient is same on all 03 servers)
Please help me out to resolve this issue as it is quite urgent issue.
Thanks in Advance. Waiting for your valuable reply.
Thanks
Pravin
Hi All,
We are going to use QM order to capture customer complaint cost through quality notification. I can able to book cost and issue materials against order. My question is that after completion of all posting, not able to put the order status to 'TECO'.
Getting message: The transaction 'Technically complete' is not allowed for ORD XXXXXXXX, because no status is set to permit it. Message no: BS002
I tried in BS22 transaction by keeping all business transactions from Forbidden to Allowed for system status I0045 - Technically completed, but not success.
There are Allowed business transactions button in KKF2 transaction, Control data tab. How to get TECO status in this tab.
I am not using any user status profile.
Please help on this issue.
Thanks
How can I download the routing operations data?
In my case there are thousands of opearations in the routing and it is difficult to copy paste page wise.
Appreciate your assistance
Hi all!
I hope you guy can help me.
How can i modify a movement type (a new one that i've created) that, when I use that movement (the same as 322) in MB1B, it creates a lot inspection with inspection lot stock?
Right now, it creates the inspection lot, but the inspection lot tab does not show...
Help me please!!!
We have a requirement to mass upload the inspection plan.But while uploading using LSMW we found that the text maintained in a MIC is not getting uploaded.For example if I have an inspection plan 12345 and the mic which is there in the plan is XYZ.
Suppose If I have maintained the text " My name is Sujit Kumar Prasad " in the MIC then this text is not getting uploaded when uploaded using LSMW.
Standard SAP has the capability to perform calculations using MIC results from within the SAME inspection operation. The formula definition is constructed using the formula parameters defined in config. E.g. A00010 + A00020 (measured value of char 0010 + measured value of char 0020).
I have a requirement to define a calculation formula that will get results for MICs that are assigned to DIFFERENT inspection operations. A quick Google search reveals this is possible using the enhancement QPAA0001 which contains four FM's
· EXIT_SAPLCQBM_001: Customer Exit When Checking Formula in CQ_BM_QSS_CONSISTENCY
· EXIT_SAPLCQCL_002: Customer-Specific Formula Checks in Inspection Characteristic
EXIT_SAPLQEEM_001: Customer Function for Calculating Formulas in Results Record
EXIT_SAPLQPAA_001: Customer Function for Formula Testing in SAPLQPAA
What I need to know is how to structure the formula to point to the relevant MICs in the specific operations required by the formula.
For e.g. CALC_MIC (operation 0030) = A00010 (operation 0020) + A00020 (operation 0050)
Does anybody have experience in defining formula's that reference MICs in different operations?
Thanks for your help :-)
Lets say i ordered for a material with 10% moisture. Now during QC it is observed that it has 12% moisture. Now based on certain calculations ( 2%*Netprice of material*Qty) i will raise a debit note against the vendor. Please suggest how to proceed with this scenario.
Dear all,
For customer return, after doing delivery of the return sales order , in system 2 inspection lot is being created, in one all details like sales order, customer number and delivery number is reflecting while in other inspection lot material document and customer number is coming. This is happening only in customer return inspection lot.
Please note that we are using z inspection types.
Thanks
Vivek Varun
Hi all, is it possible to have a formula that will find the difference for measurement nbr 2 minus measurement nbr 1, measurement nbr 3 minus measurement nbr 1, measurement nbr 4 minus measurement nbr 1, etc. in a single inspection characteristic?
If the measurements are .003, .004, .006, .003, the frmula should be .004 - .003, .006 - .003, and .003 -.003.
Any feedback or reply will be greatly appreciated.
Thanks, Aida de Jesus
Hi All,
We are using BAPI_INSPOPER_RECORDRESULTS for RR.
Its observed that in few cases, one qualitative char is not getting filled and skips for RR out of other QN and QL chars.
In some cases the same skipped char is getting filled for RR.
Verified the codes whether it is not containing any space. Codes are OK. This behaviour of System is not understable.
Can some one please guide/throw some light where it is getting failed?
Regards,
Tanuj Parikh
Skipped chars is QL (Qualitative Char) Message was edited by: Tanuj Parikh
Hi,
I am working on the scenario of QM integration with SD... now below is the requirement...when the Product returns from customer happens.. then inspection lot should be generated with stock going in to quality.... for this what settings I need to do and what is the process flow...
Is activating inspection type 06 in material master is enough ??? or any other inspection type to be used. what about any other config or master data settings we need to do....
Now is the below process flow works for me??.....
Return Sales Order creation - VA01
Inbound delivery Creation - VL01N
Automatic Inspection lot- QA03
Results recording and Usage decision - QA32
PGR (Vl02n)
Invoice ( wrt: Sales Order-VF01)
Thanks
Kumar
Hi,
I have read and gone through the help section, the manual and many posts here on SCN. So, the best way to get my query cleared is to lay out the scenario I am trying so that the experts out there can tell me what I am doing wrong or missing out. So, here goes:
Can anyone pleas let me know what I am missing or doing wrong? I really need urgent help. Thank you so much.
Dear Gurus
A solution is needed for the secnario described below.
Quality inspection lot origin 04 is created when our production worksheet gets confirmed.
The materials are consumed thru backflushing with movement type 261.This is a zdevelopment.
The production supervisor commits some mistake while entering which is identified later, the reason
being wrong production version, or wrong material entered.
Meanwhile the quality personnel has entered their test results against each MIC of the material having
different batch nos in the inspection lot.
To rectify the error , the production supervisor will be creating a new worksheet with the correct entry
and confirms the worksheet , triggering creation of another new inspection lot.
The quality people doesn't want to re-enter the results in the new inspection lot if the material is same
They want all the results of the old inspection lot to be copied onto the new inspection lot against each batch.
The old worksheet is cancelled and the material consumption are withdrawn with movement type 262
The results of th inspection lot(wrong) should be copied to the new inspection lot created only when the users comes across this situation.
tried doing it , but not able to succeed , because for each inspection lot entry, it is asking for the
source inspection lot, and the results are not getting copied.
Is there any way to do this only when required for copying.
Pls help.
Regards
Vidhyadharan
Hi Experts,
When user trying to record the results/usage decision for the inspection lot, system is not allowing and saying that basic settings need to be mainained for QM in Plant.
We have checked the "Plant dependent QM settings" in SPRO, there the plant is not found.
Can you please guide us how to bring the plant into "Plant dependent QM settings". which setting is causing such problem,
Thanks in advance,